News

Indictments Are Coming in Jackson Case


michael jackson1 300x141 Indictments Are Coming in Jackson Case newsWith the various angles of the Michael Jackson cases slowly building up in court, many people are wondering just when charges will come down and even why they haven’t yet. PopEater was able to speak with best-selling Jackson biographer Ian Halperin as well as Judge Larry Seidlin, who presided over the equally public and dramatic Anna Nicole Smith case in 2007. Seidlin tells PopEater that investigators are “traveling on the same roadmap” in the Jackson investigation that they were in the Smith case, while Halperin tells us that “indictments are coming down against more than one doctor.

In reference to word that Katherine Jackson is possibly planning on filing a wrongful death suit in the Jackson case, Halperin tells PopEater that “the reason Katherine is now preparing a wrongful death suit is that she and the family have been informed by the LAPD that indictments are coming down against more than one doctor. Conrad Murray is broke so a lawsuit against him won’t net much, but some of the other doctors are rolling in money and they are fair game.”

Halperin says that “Katherine is just as concerned at this point with the money of the guys who surrounded Jackson, who she is convinced looted her son’s assets in his final years.” As for the estate control part of the Jackson’s case, Halperin says he’s “learned in the last few days that Michael definitely didn’t want [co-executors John Branca and John McClain] to control his estate at the time of his death. I’ve learned that from key sources close to Michael. That’s why Katherine is pursuing this in court.”

Seidlin tells PopEater that “the Michael Jackson case is Anna Nicole 2,” and even says he’s “willing to volunteer out of my own pocket and go to California and be a mediator to resolve this case. with Joe Jackson, Katherine Jackson, the executors of the estate and [Debbie] Rowe, and bring these parties together. These three children of Michael Jackson need stability. They need a stable, healthy environment.”

Seidlin agrees with Halperin about upcoming charges, saying that “criminal charges are going to flow from this case. I’m prepared to predict with certainty that people will be charged with crimes. They want to dot every I and cross every T. ”

Seidlin says the Los Angeles Police Department has “their suspects twisting in the wind. Their knees are shaking … All the stars line up in the sky and then that pinball machine completely lights up and then they hand down charges against doctors, enablers, pharmacies. At the end, there wil be a number of people wearing striped pajamas.”

He also tells us that it may “take a year, year-and-a-half to slam the folks they have as targets.”

GD Star Rating
loading...
GD Star Rating
loading...
Start Slide Show with PicLens Lite PicLensButton Indictments Are Coming in Jackson Case news
lg share en Indictments Are Coming in Jackson Case news

Family

Jackson/Rowe Not the Biological Parents


Jackson Rowe Not the Biological Parents2 Jackson/Rowe Not the Biological Parents familyWe’ve learned Michael Jackson was not the biological father of any of his children. And Debbie Rowe is not the biological mother of the two kids she bore for Michael. All three children were conceived in vitro — outside the womb. Multiple sources deeply connected to the births tell us Michael was not the sperm donor for any of his kids. Debbie’s eggs were not used. She was merely the surrogate, and paid well for her services in the births of Michael Jr. and Paris.

In the case of Prince Michael II (the youngest), we’re told the surrogate was never told of the identity of the “receiving parent” — Michael Jackson. Three days after Prince was born at Grossmont Hospital in San Diego County, Jackson’s lawyer came to the hospital to pick the baby up and deliver him to Michael.

We do not know if Jackson chose the sperm or egg donors or if he even knew who they were. Although Rowe is not the biological mother, it’s not a slam dunk that she would lose a custody battle. This type of case has never been litigated in California courts. Since Rowe was married to Jackson when Michael Jr. and Paris were born, there’s a presumption that she’s the biological parent. That presumption can be rebutted by other evidence. We know there are documents outlining the whole arrangement for the birth of all three kids. Nonetheless, it’s still an open issue with the courts.

from www.tmz.com

GD Star Rating
loading...
GD Star Rating
loading...
pixel Jackson/Rowe Not the Biological Parents familyStart Slide Show with PicLens Lite PicLensButton Jackson/Rowe Not the Biological Parents family
lg share en Jackson/Rowe Not the Biological Parents family